Microvascular Responsiveness to Pulsatile and Nonpulsatile Flow During Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Pulsatile perfusion may offer microcirculatory advantages over conventional nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Here, we present direct visual evidence of microvascular perfusion and vasoreactivity between perfusion modalities. METHODS: A prospective, randomized cohort study of 20 high-risk cardiac surgical patients undergoing pulsatile (n = 10) or nonpulsatile (n = 10) flow during CPB was conducted. Changes in sublingual mucosal microcirculation were assessed with orthogonal polarization spectral imaging along with near-infrared spectroscopic indices of thenar muscle tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) and its recovery during a vascular occlusion test at the following time points: baseline (T0), 30 minutes on CPB (T1), 90 minutes on CPB (T2), 1 hour after CPB (T3), and 24 hours after CPB (T4). RESULTS: On the basis of our scoring scale, a shift in microcirculatory blood flow occurred over time. The pulsatile group maintained normal perfusion characteristics, whereas the nonpulsatile group exhibited deterioration in perfusion during CPB (T2: 74.0% ± 5.6% versus 57.6% ± 5.0%) and after CPB (T3: 76.2% ± 2.7% versus 58.9% ± 5.2%, T4: 85.7% ± 2.6% versus 69.8% ± 5.9%). Concurrently, no important differences were found between groups in baseline StO2 and consumption slope at all time points. Reperfusion slope was substantially different between groups 24 hours after CPB (T4: 6.1% ± 0.6% versus 3.7% ± 0.5%), indicating improved microvascular responsiveness in the pulsatile group versus the nonpulsatile group. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsatility generated by the roller pump during CPB improves microcirculatory blood flow and tissue oxygen saturation compared with nonpulsatile flow in high-risk cardiac surgical patients, which may reflect attenuation of the systemic inflammatory response and ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Rapid, high-fluence multi-pass q-switched laser treatment of tattoos with a transparent perfluorodecalin-infused patch: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Perfluorodecalin (PFD) has previously been shown to rapidly dissipate the opaque, white micro-bubble layer formed after exposure of tattoos to Q-switched lasers [1]. The current pilot study was conducted to qualitatively determine if the use of a transparent PFD-infused silicone patch would result in more rapid clearance of tattoos than conventional through-air techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Black or dark blue tattoos were divided into two halves in a single-site IRB-approved study with 17 subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types I-III. One half of each tattoo served as its own control and was treated with one pass of a standard Q-switched Alexandrite laser (755 nm). The other half of the tattoo was treated directly through a transparent perfluorodecalin (PFD) infused patch (ON Light Sciences, Dublin, CA). The rapid whitening reduction effect of the Patch routinely allowed three to four laser passes in a total of approximately 5 minutes. Both sides were treated at highest tolerated fluence, but the optical clearing, index-matching, and epidermal protection properties of the PFD Patch allowed significantly higher fluence compared to the control side. Standard photographs were taken at baseline, immediately prior to treatment with the PFD Patch in place, and finally before and after each treatment session. Treatments were administered at 4- to 6-week intervals. RESULTS: In a majority of subjects (11 of 17), tattoos treated through a transparent PFD-infused patch showed more rapid tattoo clearance with higher patient and clinician satisfaction than conventional treatment. In no case did the control side fade faster than the PFD Patch side. No unanticipated adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid multi-pass treatment of tattoos with highest tolerated fluence facilitated by a transparent PFD-infused patch clears tattoos more rapidly than conventional methods.

Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass: microcirculatory and systemic effects.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal perfusion modality during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Here we compare the effects of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion on microvascular blood flow during and after CPB. METHODS: High-risk cardiac surgical patients were randomly assigned to have pulsatile (n=10) or nonpulsatile (n=10) flow during CPB. The sublingual microcirculation was assessed using orthogonal polarization spectral imaging. Hemodynamic and microvascular variables were obtained after anesthesia (baseline), during CPB, and post-CPB. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, a normal microcirculatory blood flow pattern was accomplished at all time points under pulsatile flow conditions. Peaking 24 hours postoperatively, a higher proportion of normally perfused microvessels occurred under pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow (56.0%±3.9% vs 33.3%±4.1%; p<0.05). Concurrently, pulsatility resulted in a reduction in the prevalence of pathologic hyper-dynamically perfused vessels (6.0%±3.4% vs 19.6%±8.8%; p<0.05). Leukocyte adherence decreased relative to the nonpulsatile group both during and after CPB. Furthermore, peak lactate levels were reduced under pulsatile flow conditions postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Pulsatile perfusion is superior to nonpulsatile perfusion at preserving the microcirculation, which may reflect attenuation of the systemic inflammatory response during CPB. We suggest the implementation of pulsatile flow can better optimize microvascular perfusion, and may lead to improved patient outcomes in high-risk cardiac surgical procedures requiring prolonged CPB time.

The influence of larger subcutaneous blood vessels on pulse oximetry.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have renewed interest in reflectance pulse oximetry, specifically for monitoring the patient's forehead. Blood circulation on the forehead immediately above the eyebrow is fed by arteries that branch from the internal carotid artery and lack the vasoconstrictor response present in more peripheral regions. Some investigators question, however, the reliability of monitoring SpO2 on the forehead due to prior reported inaccurate readings with reflectance sensors. The present study evaluates pulse oximetry accuracy when reflectance sensors are placed over potentially pulsing or moving larger arterial vessels, or over more homogeneous microvasculature devoid of larger subcutaneous vessels. METHODS. Ten healthy adult volunteers were fitted with reflectance pulse oximetry sensors and exposed to a controlled desaturation to 70%. Sensors were placed immediately above the left and right eyebrows as well as over the temple. Additionally, numerical modeling was used to simulate light signals and photon migration through a homogeneous tissue bed with an added static or dynamic artery. RESULTS: Sensors placed above the eyebrows tracked one another with significantly better accuracy than when comparing temple with the brow placement (RMS of the Differences = 1.12% vs. 4.24%, respectively). Photon migration simulations indicate that the detected light bypasses the interior of larger vessels, while vessel presence affects the red and IR light pulse amplitudes independent of SaO2. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of reflectance pulse oximetry sensors directly over larger cardio-synchronously pulsing or moving vasculature can significantly degrade SpO2 reading accuracy. Reflectance sensors placed low on the forehead directly over the eyebrow and slightly lateral to the iris appear to avoid such vasculature and provide consistent and accurate estimates of SaO2.